![]() The scientific quality of monitoring for diffuse environmental impacts has rarely been quantified. Insights for communication from this analysis include the importance of using clear language that provides exact and solid examples of risks, especially in light of the media's agenda-setting power and with an issue that the general public does not have direct experience. By February 2014 the issue was covered by sources throughout Australia and represented a range of risks to the GBR, and its World Heritage status, in relation to coal mining and port developments. In January 2013 the dredge spoil issue was mainly covered by local sources and focused on risks to local livelihoods and environments. Environmental Disaster was the most prominent overall, and often positioned in opposition to Industrialism. Media analysis explored the questions: how is ‘risk’ represented, who is linked to different risk perceptions, and how has the media coverage of the issue changed over time? Results show that ‘risk’ to the Great Barrier Reef from the dredge spoil was framed by four main themes: Environmental Disaster, Socio-economic Disaster, Equilibrium and Industrialism. This paper identifies different perceptions of risk portrayed by local, regional, interstate and national print media in relation to the dredge spoil issue from January 2013 until February 2014. ![]() The media has played a key role in representing different risk perceptions, and potentially influencing policy decision-making. ![]() ![]() The disposal of dredge spoil in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park for port expansion at Abbot Point in North Queensland, Australia, has been a contentious issue receiving extensive media coverage. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |